AI for Public Servants: The Complete Australian Guide (2026)

Australian public servants are increasingly working alongside AI tools. The Australian Government has published an AI Ethics Framework and the Australian Public Service Commission has issued guidance on the responsible use of AI in the APS. State and territory governments have developed their own frameworks.

This guide covers what AI can realistically do for public servants, which tools are being used across the APS, and how to approach AI adoption in a way that is consistent with the values and obligations of public service.

---

The Public Sector Context

Using AI as a public servant is different from using it in a private sector role. Public servants are accountable to the public, bound by the APS Values and Code of Conduct, and subject to specific legal obligations around privacy, records management, and decision-making.

The key principles that should guide AI use in the public sector are:

• Accountability: Public servants remain accountable for decisions and outputs, even when AI tools are used to assist with them.
• Transparency: Citizens have a right to know when AI is being used in government processes that affect them.
• Privacy: Personal information must be handled in accordance with the Privacy Act 1988 and agency-specific privacy policies.
• Accuracy: Government information must be accurate. AI-generated content must be reviewed before it is used in official documents or communications.

---

What AI Can Do for Public Servants

1. Writing and Document Drafting

Public servants spend a significant proportion of their time writing — briefs, reports, correspondence, policy documents, submissions, and presentations. AI writing tools can produce first drafts of these documents quickly, which staff then review, refine, and finalise.

The Australian Government has been piloting Microsoft Copilot across a number of agencies. The Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) has provided guidance on the use of generative AI in the APS.

2. Research and Summarisation

Policy work involves reviewing large volumes of research, reports, and submissions. AI tools can summarise lengthy documents, identify key themes in a body of literature, and help public servants quickly get across a topic.

This is particularly useful for policy officers who need to brief ministers or senior officials on complex topics at short notice.

3. Citizen Service Delivery

AI-powered tools are being used across Australian government agencies to improve citizen services — chatbots for common enquiries, automated processing of routine applications, and personalised information delivery.

Services Australia has been exploring AI to improve the efficiency of welfare payment processing. The Australian Taxation Office uses AI for fraud detection and compliance risk assessment.

4. Data Analysis

Government agencies collect and hold large volumes of data. AI tools can help public servants analyse this data to identify trends, inform policy decisions, and improve service delivery.

5. Meeting Support

AI transcription and summarisation tools can help public servants manage the administrative burden of meetings — producing draft minutes, summarising key decisions, and tracking action items.

---

AI Tools Used Across the APS

Microsoft Copilot

The Australian Government has been rolling out Microsoft Copilot across agencies that use Microsoft 365. Copilot is integrated into Word, Outlook, Teams, and other Microsoft applications, making it accessible within existing workflows.

Microsoft has a specific government cloud offering (Microsoft Azure Government) with data residency in Australia, which addresses some of the data sovereignty concerns relevant to government use.

ChatGPT (Enterprise)

Some agencies have adopted ChatGPT Enterprise, which offers stronger data privacy protections than the consumer version. Prompts and responses are not used for model training under the Enterprise plan.

Agency-Specific AI Tools

Some agencies have developed or procured AI tools specific to their functions — for example, AI-assisted document processing, automated correspondence classification, and data analytics platforms.

---

APS Guidance on AI Use

The Australian Public Service Commission has issued guidance on the responsible use of AI in the APS. Key points include:

• Public servants must comply with the APS Values and Code of Conduct when using AI tools.
• AI-generated content must be reviewed for accuracy before use in official documents or communications.
• Personal information must not be entered into AI tools that do not have appropriate data processing agreements.
• Public servants remain accountable for decisions and outputs, even when AI tools are used.

The Digital Transformation Agency has also published guidance on the use of generative AI in government, including a framework for assessing the risks of specific AI use cases.

---

State and Territory Frameworks

State and territory governments have developed their own frameworks for AI use in the public sector:

• NSW: The NSW Government has published an AI Strategy and guidance on responsible AI use in government agencies.
• Victoria: The Victorian Government has developed an AI Framework for the Victorian Public Service.
• Queensland: The Queensland Government has published guidance on the use of AI in government.

Public servants should be aware of the specific framework that applies to their jurisdiction.

---

Getting Started

For most public servants, the practical starting point is using AI writing tools for internal documents — drafting briefs, summarising reports, producing first drafts of correspondence. This is low-risk and provides immediate time savings.

Before using any AI tool for work purposes, check whether your agency has approved the tool and whether there are specific guidelines for its use. Many agencies have developed or are developing AI usage policies.

If your agency has not yet provided guidance, the safest approach is to use AI only for tasks that do not involve personal information, classified information, or sensitive policy matters — and to always review AI output before using it in official documents.